![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Product Management Software ComparisonInterested in finding out what Product Management software is available to help you do your job more effectively? Our clients ask us for list and comparison of the different packages all of the time. Following is a summary and comparison of the leading Product Management software programs. Note: there is also a write up at the bottom of this page of a Product Management Software panel that we ran for SVPMA. If you would like assistance in choosing or implementing any of the product management software in this comparison contact us. ReqDB from Requirements Management. Accept 360
from Accept Software Product Pathfinder from Nihito Technologies
Qpack from Orcanos FeaturePlan from Ryma Technology Solutions Accompa is an on-demand requirements management software for product managers. It enables product managers to store and manage requirements centrally, and share it across teams in real-time. It allows cross-functional teams to engage in discussions on each requirement which are archived for future reference and are searchable. All changes are automatically tracked, and there is a wizard to create preliminary MRD/PRD documents. It costs $25/month/user for the first 10 licenses, and $15/month/user after that. A 30-day fully-functional free trial is available.
Product Management Software Comparison: The State of the Art In October 2005 the Silicon Valley Product Management Association held an event focusing on “Product Management Software: The State of the Art.” Three executives from leading product management, requirements management, and product planning companies performed a show-n-tell of their solutions so that attendees could make a comparison. They then participated in a panel discussion led by SVPMA’s President, Brian Lawley. Representing the solutions were: James Davies of Accept Software went first. Accept 360 is a modular Product Management Software suite that came from engineer’s frustrations at not knowing where various requirements were coming from. Accept 360 makes it explicit which requirements are committed on contracts, which are because of the competition, etc. Further, features have a value, a cost, and a market impact that can be analyzed more rigorously than the traditional P1 – P4 rating that is usually given in requirements documents. This makes it much easier to do portfolio analysis and compare development scenarios than manually running "What If" scenarios. Once the requirements are in the system, MRDs and PRDs can be automatically generated. The solution can be hosted or installed locally by module and is role based. Next up for the comparison was Joachim Karlsson from Telelogic. Focal Point was first launched in 1998 in Windows. The web software version came out in 2001 and has a strong presence in Northern Europe with company leaders such as Volvo, Nokia, and ABB. Focal Point was acquired by Telelogic about six months ago and is now being sold globally. Focal Point helps the user start at the market segments and manage this down to features, products, resources, and finally the release. The product has a semantic search engine to help identify duplicate features in the system. It also assists the user in prioritizing the features by displaying them side by side and letting constituents rank which is the most important relative to each other. This data can then be segmented by market, stake holder group, customer, etc. Mr.Karlsson said Focal Point helps companies “identify and make a comparison of everything we could do, then decide what we should do.” The solution can be hosted or installed locally by module and is role based. The final comparison was with Andre Levesque of Ryma Technology Solutions. FeaturePlan automates the Pragmatic Marketing framework and promises that you will spend less time on the tactical and more on the strategic activities. It was launched in 2004 and is 100% .net and sits on SQL Server. The next release will be fully web based asp/.net. FeaturePlan starts by organizing all the inbound sources of data including win/loss reports, call statements, incident reports, market research, competitive analysis, etc. From these, the user creates problem statements. Requirements are then written, and finally those requirements are grouped into releases creating the roadmap or “market release table.” The solution is fully integrated and is role based. Amazingly, all three vendor demonstrations worked flawlessly and showed the strong capabilities of Product Management applications in the market place. Further, all the solutions have many more capabilities than could be demonstrated to the audience or captured here in this article. Although none of the vendors would be pinned down on specific pricing, you should budget $65 - $100 per user per month depending on size of installations and modules purchased. The only way to make an accurate comparison is to contact the companies directly and speak with their sales people.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resources 280 LinkedIn Product Management Group Product Management & Marketing Job Listings Product Management & Marketing White Papers Product Management & Marketing Newsletter Product Management Software Comparison Product Management Associations Silicon Valley Marketing Directory Product Manager Job Description Product Management & Marketing Books
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| This product management software comparison is for informational purposes only. The comparison should not be considered an endorsement or recommendation for any of the particular products. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Website content Copyright 2003-2007, 280 Group LLC. All rights reserved including the right of reproduction in whole or in part of any form. 280 Group and the 280 Group logos are trademarks of 280 Group LLC. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. | |||||||||||||||||||||